|
Key
This line was removed.
This word was removed. This word was added.
This line was added.
|
Comment:
Changes (1)
View Page History
...
The Server Backup Manager Disk Safe is highly reliable and robust, built with industrial grade protection from crashes and power loss. It has automatic mechanisms that protect terabytes of archived data from crashes and power failures not found in any other disk-to-disk backup software. This is accomplished using an atomic write journal. Before any changes are made to a Disk Safe file, a new on-disk journal file is created. Before any Disk Safe pages are altered, the original content of the Disk Safe pages are written to the journal file. This allows any transaction to be completely rolled back, even if interrupted by a crash or power failure. The Disk Safe assumes that the operating system will buffer writes and that a write request will return before data has actually been written to disk. The Disk Safe also assumes that write operations will be reordered by the operating system. For this reason, the Disk Safe performs {{FlushFileBuffers()}} on Windows or {{fsync()}} operation on Linux at key points.
----
{toc:location=top|maxLevel=3|minLevel=3|type=flat|separator=pipe|style=border:1}
----
h3. Always use stable and reliable storage
Tips for selecting stable and reliable storage:
* Only use NAS appliances that support NFS locking; this includes most commercial-grade NAS appliances, but not all.
* If you are using hardware RAID, it is recommended to use a battery backup unit (BBU) for the RAID card or RAID system.
* If you do not have a BBU for your RAID system, it is recommended to disable the write back cache. Consult the documentation for your RAID system.
* IDE drives are not recommended. It has been reported many IDE drives ignore signals to flush their on-disk cache.
* If using network attached block storage such as a: ISCSI or ATA-over-Ethernet, it is highly recommended you thoroughly test your storage environment for its ability to handle failures. In particular network level failures. It has been reported by our customers that these types of storage systems are the most prone to hardware and network faults.
* Avoid budget RAID cards. It has been reported that frequently entry level RAID cards can have serious performance and reliability issues. At the bottom end are some budget RAID cards that do not even perform hardware RAID and instead are simply a SATA card with a software RAID driver.
* USB and other portable media are great for temporary transport of a Disk Safe from one location to another. USB and other portable media should not be used for regular storage of Disk Safes. These types of inexpensive storage have been reported to ignore signals to flush their on-disk cache. In addition, their portable nature can cause disconnects or power failures simply by nudging a cable.
----
h3. Store Disk Safes on a different disk
When using Server Backup Manager, it is recommended that you store your Disk Safes on a different physical disk from the disk or disks you are replicating. While SBM does support writing the Disk Safe to the same disk and even the same partition and file system you are replicating, it is *not* recommended. Replicating a drive to itself can cause severe disk saturation and performance issues.
h5. Windows example recommended configurations
* Replicate C:\ partition on a single SATA disk to E:\ a partition on a *different* physical SATA disk.
* Replicate C:\ to a network file system (CIFS).
* Replicate C:\ partition or mapped LUN on a hardware RAID controller to E:\ , a different physical SATA disk.
* Replicate C:\ partition or mapped LUN on a hardware RAID controller to a network file system (CIFS).
* Replicate C:\ mapped LUN on a hardware RAID controller to E:\ , a mapped LUN on a *different* RAID controller.
h5. Linux example recommended configurations
* Replicate {{/dev/sda3}} partition on a single SATA disk to {{/dev/sdb3}} partition on a *different* physical SATA disk.
* Replicate {{/dev/sda3}} to a network file system (NFS).
* Replicate {{/dev/sda3}} partition or mapped LUN on a hardware RAID controller to {{/dev/sdb3}} different physical SATA disk.
* Replicate {{/dev/sda3}} partition or mapped LUN on a hardware RAID controller to a network file system (CIFS).
* Replicate {{/dev/sda3}} mapped LUN on a hardware RAID controller to {{/dev/sdb3}} mapped LUN on a *different* RAID controller.
h5. Windows +not+ recommended except for testing purposes
* Replicate C:\ to a Disk Safe stored on C:\.
* Replicate C:\ partition on a single SATA disk to D:\ , a different partition on the same physical SATA disk.
* Replicate C:\ partition or mapped LUN on a hardware RAID controller to E:\ , a different partition or mapped LUN on the same physical RAID controller.
h5. Linux +not+ recommended except for testing purposes
* Replicate {{/dev/sda3}} to a Disk Safe stored on {{/dev/sda3}}.
* Replicate {{/dev/sda3}} partition on a single SATA disk to {{/dev/sda5}}, a different partition on the same physical SATA disk.
* Replicate {{/dev/sda3}} partition or mapped LUN on a hardware RAID controller to {{/dev/sdb3,}} a different partition or mapped LUN on the same physical RAID controller.
----
h3. Only use USB drives to transport Disk Safes
Use USB drives to transport Disk Safes. For example, a USB drive is excellent for moving a Disk Safe from your office to your data center, or between two Server Backup Managers connected by a slow network connection. When using a USB drive, follow the steps to safely remove the device from your computer.
R1Soft does *not* recommend using a USB drive as the every day, primary storage for Disk Safes. USB drives tend to be unreliable and it has been reported that many USB drives ignore {{FlushFileBuffers()}} and {{fsync()}} requests to clear hard disk cache.
----
h3. 32-bit or 64-bit for Server Backup Manager
Always use a 64-bit CPU(s) and 64-bit operating system for Server Backup Manager whenever possible. The main benefit of a 64-bit environment is that the Server Backup Manager process is not limited to a 32-bit address space.
If you are using a 32-bit server, each processes address space is limited to less than 2 GB, even when physical address extensions ([PAE)|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension] are enabled. Backup is a single multi-threaded process. Each thread will readily execute on a different CPUs/cores at the same time; however, all the threads share the same virtual address space limiting the total memory of Server Backup Manager on 32-bit to less than 2 GB. Why not 4 GB? Windows and Linux virtual memory space is actually 31 bits (2 GB) because the last bit is reserved. Also, some portions of the 31-bit virtual address space is further reserved by the operating system. Typical usable virtual address space on 32-bit is somewhere between 1.5 - 1.8 GB depending on the environment.
----
h3. Windows best practices
* Schedule a weekly defragmentation of the file system where Disk Safes are stored.
* Install Server Backup Manager on Windows 2008 R2 whenever possible. Windows 2008 R2 has highly optimized disk I/O performance.
* Store Disk Safes on a NTFS file system formatted with a 32 KB cluster size. 32 KB matches the internal "page" size used by the Disk Safe when reading and writing from disk
* To store Disk Safes on a network file system, use a Windows storage server or Windows Server O/S for your file server. A reliable network attached storage device supporting the CIFS protocol is also recommended. Using Linux SAMBA software for network file storage of Disk Safes is *not* recommended.
----
h3. Linux best practices
* If your kernel version has *stable* support for Ext4, then Ext4 is highly recommended for performance over Ext3 for Disk Safe storage.
* If using Ext4, make sure you are using Ext4 extents. Extents help reduce file system fragmentation.
* Add the mount option barrier=1 to /etc/fstab on Ext3 file systems where Disk Safes are stored, *OR* disable your storage controller's write cache. Ext3 does not check sum the journal. If barrier=1 is not enabled as a mount option (in /etc/fstab), and if the hardware is doing out-of-order write caching, you run the risk of severe file system corruption during a crash. For more information, [click here|http://blog.nirkabel.org/2008/12/07/ext3-write-barriers-and-write-caching/].
* Storing Disk Safes on Ext3 can cause performance problems. The Disk Safe periodically (sometimes frequently) use {{fsync()}} to force changes to the file through to disk hardware to ensure data is protected from a power loss or crash. Ext3 has a well known broken implementation of {{fsync()}} causing a flush file buffers on one Disk Safe file to sync the entire file system to disk. This can have a severe performance penalty on Disk Safe I/O and writes to one Disk Safe can degrade reads of other Disk Safes due to Ext3's well known {{fsync()}} issues.
* If storing your Disk Safes on Ext3, it is recommended that only other Disk Safes are stored on the file system due to Ext3's problematic {{fsync()}} implementation. Do not store applications and daemons on a Ext3 file system with your Disk Safes if you can avoid it.
* When using Ext3 or Ext4, make sure you accept the default block size (4 KB). Forcing smaller block sizes will decrease performance for the Disk Safe's large files and can limit max file size to as little as 16 GB, which will likely cause 'File too Large' errors during initial replicas.
* Use NFS to store Disk Safe on a network file system. If using NFS, it is recommended to use the latest stable NFS versions and latest stable Linux kernels.
* *Never* export NFS file systems with asynchronous writes enabled ({{async}} option). Exporting NFS with the *async option can cause data corruption* in the event of a failure.
----
h3. Defragment file systems
The Server Backup Manager Disk Safe is a storage system for long-term archiving of unique block-level (units of data below the file system) deltas (small differences in data). SBM extends the Disk Safe files and makes write in predictable 32 KB increments. This helps the modern Windows and Linux file systems pre-allocate space for the Disk Safe files and naturally reduce file fragmentation. As the Disk Safe block stores ({{.db}} files) for each device, you are protecting age. Some data inside those files remains forever and some is marked deleted and recycled for new deltas as old data is merged out over time. If there is no recycled free space inside of the file for new deltas, the file is extended on disk. This can happen anytime a new recovery point is created.
Generally, any files that remain on disk for a long period of time and continue to be written to and extended in size are subject to [file system fragmentation|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragmentation_%28computer%29]. This is true for the R1Soft Disk Safe and other long-term storage mechanisms (for example, a relational database like MS SQL Server and MySQL).
For optimal performance, R1Soft recommends that you periodically [defrag|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defrag] your file systems where Disk Safes are stored. If it is feasible in your environment, a weekly file system defrag is optimal.
h4. Windows
h5.
We recommend [contig|http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897428.aspx] by MS Sysinternals to analyze the fragmentation of specific files and folders and [Auslogics Defrag|http://www.auslogics.com/disk-defrag] for regular scheduled file system defrags
*1. Determine how fragmented your* *Disk Safe{*}* files are.*
* Install {{contig.}}
* Run {{contig}} with {{\-s}} and {{\-a}} options and give contig the path to the folder where your Disk Safes are stored like:
{code}
contig -a -s D:\PATH\TO\YOUR\DISK\SAFES
{code}
This may take a while.
*2. Use Auslogics to schedule weekly file system defragment tasks on your Backup machine*
!disk-defrag.png|thumbnail!
h4. Linux
h5.
Unfortunately, the Linux operating system is lacking stable online file system defrag capability.
Here are your options:
*1. XFS file system has defrag capability.*
[How to use XFS defrag|http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/141404].
[Tutorial for XFS on CentOS|http://blogwords.neologix.net/neils/?p=1].
{info:title=Note on Linux XFS}It is not possible to use multi-point replication with XFS.
{info}
*2. Ext4 promises defrag in the future.*
Ext4 has an experimental online defrag capability. Eventually, we all expect this to become stable for production servers.
Ext4 has extents which help reduce file fragmentation. Extents do not eliminate file system fragmentation and Ext4 can still benefit from defrag just like NTFS on Windows.
_Be aware the consensus is ext4 online defrag is NOT ready for production systems._
[Click here|https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/321528] for a thread in ubuntu bugs about the topic of ext4 online defrag (look for I_KNOW_E4DEFRAG_MAY_DESTROY_MY_DATA_AND_WILL_DO_BACKUPS_FIRST).
*3. Offline Defrag for Ext3 and Ext4.*
It is possible to perform an offline defrag of any Linux file system. Due to the work involved, it is recommended to perform this task only once or twice a year.
# Shut down your Backup Manager:
{code}
/etc/init.d/cdp-server stop
{code}
# Add an intermediate disk available capable of holding all of your Disk Safes (could be network storage).
# Copy all of your Disk Safes to the intermediate storage:
{code}
cp -af /disk/safes/* to /mnt/storage/
{code}
# Re-format the file system that has the primary copy of your Disk Safe:
{code}
mkfs /dev/YOUR_DEVICE
{code}
# Copy all of the Disk Safe files back:
{code}
cp -af /mnt/storage/* /disk/safes/
{code}
# Start the Backup Manager:
{code}
/etc/init.d/cdp-server start
{code}
{info:title=Note on Linux Defrag}There appears to be a widespread fallacy that somehow Linux file systems (ext2, ext3, and ext4) are magically immune to fragmentation. This could not be further from the truth. It's true that the kernel does a "pre-allocation" as you are writing to a file. It will attempt to notice that an application keeps extending a file and allocate contiguous blocks ahead of what it is doing. Windows also does this for NTFS. No matter how fantastical pre-allocation or the file system may be, files get fragmented and you need a way to pack them. Linux file systems are no exception.
{info}
----
h3. When to vacuum Disk Safe
For best performance, vacuum your Disk Safes when you need to reclaim unused storage space. The Vacuum function reorders the data to reduce fragmentation. Once the vacuum is complete, the Disk Safe is populated with all Recovery and Archive points. This important maintenance can significantly improve restore performance and shrink the on-disk size of the Disk Safe.
For more about Disk Safe vacuum, see [Vacuum Disk Safes|Vacuum disk safes]. Disk Safes].
If you are a service provider using the Server Backup Manager as a multi-tenant system, use [Volume|Manage volumes] quotas based on *Size of Deltas in Disk Safe* instead of *On Disk Size*. This way your customers only pay for what is stored in the Disk Safe instead of the on-disk foot print which includes the unused parts of the Disk Safe file being recycled for future deltas.
... ----
h3. Corruption of data archived in the Disk Safe
The Server Backup Manager Disk Safe is highly reliable and robust. Even with industrial grade protection, there are still ways for your data to become lost or damaged beyond repair. If any of the following events occur, you may corrupt your Disk Safe. If your Disk Safe becomes corrupted, you may lose all or some of your archived data.
If the SBM Disk Safe is corrupted by any one of the events below, it cannot be repaired.
* Delete a file in the Disk Safe folder.
* Make an incomplete copy of the Disk Safe folder, thereby corrupting the copy.
* Making a copy of the Disk Safe files when the Disk Safe is open and being written to by Server Backup Manager, thereby corrupting the copy.
* A hardware or O/S fault causing incorrect data to be written to Disk Safe files.
* A faulty hard disk or storage controller failing to flush volatile cache when requested can break protection from unclean shutdowns and power failures.
* Rogue process writing to the Disk Safe files.
* Soft linking any files _Inside_ of the Disk Safe folder. If the block deltas store and its associated write journal (created at run time) end up on different file systems data loss can occur if there is a crash or power failure.
* Failure to store the Disk Safe on a journaling file system can cause the write journal to be lost or moved to lost+found. If this happens, the Disk Safe may likely become damaged beyond repair.
{info:title=Note}Windows NTFS and Linux Ext3, Ext4, XFS, and ReiserFS are Journaling File Systems.
{info}
* NFS (Linux / Unix Network File System) faults or bugs.
If using NFS on Linux, R1Soft recommends you use the latest available NFS versions and latest stable Linux kernels. Do not export NFS file systems with asynchronous writes (async option).
----
h3. Data corruption in your environment
* If your file system is corrupt at the time you replicated it, this does not mean your Disk Safe is corrupt. Instead it is corruption that was on your primary storage when Server Backup Manager replicated it to the Disk Safe. If this happens, the corrupt files will likely be unrecoverable.
* Use caution if you are replicating a server that has file system or disk subsystem warnings or errors in the event or system logs. Be aware it is possible for a working server to have file system corruption. Key file system data structures may be damaged on disk and loaded in memory by the operating system, causing a corrupt file system to work until it is rebooted. If this happens, your files were corrupt when replicated and you may not be able to restore them from the Server Backup Manager replica.
* It is possible for hardware or O/S faults to cause incorrect data to be read from the Disk Safe at the time of restore, even though the data on disk media is correct. In these cases, some or all of the archived data may appear damaged beyond repair until the fault is corrected. Determining if the fault is occurring only on read or if the data is damaged on media may be difficult or impossible. Furthermore, no amount of checking or validating of data in the Disk Safe can prevent or pre-warn these kinds of faults.
\\ {excerpt:hidden=true}Best practices concerning the reliability of Disk Safes and what can corrupt Disk Safes in Server Backup Manager.{excerpt}